LATEST DETAILS

Concealment penalty SLP granted against High Courts ruling that where assessee disclosed additional income only after search of premises of another assessee by DIT which unearthed certain evidences indicating that certain expenditure claimed by assessee was disallowable, it would amount to concealment of income liable to penalty under section 271(1)(c)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

 

SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 28286 & 28287 OF 2015

 

Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd..................................................................Appellant.
v.
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-II, Kolkata.................................Respondent

 

R.K. AGRAWAL AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.

 
Date :MARCH  6, 2017 
 
Appearances

R.V. Easwar, Sr. Adv., Narinder K. Verma, Satyendra Kumar, Rishi Agrawala, Manan Shukla and E.C. Agrawala, Advs. for the Petitioner. 
K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Dhruv Sharma, H.R. Rao and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advs. for the Respondent.


Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Penalty — Concealment penalty — SLP granted against High Court's ruling that where assessee disclosed additional income only after search of premises of another assessee by DIT which unearthed certain evidences indicating that certain expenditure claimed by assessee was disallowable, it would amount to concealment of income liable to penalty under section 271(1)(c) — Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax.


JUDGMENT


1. Leave granted.

2. Hearing expedited.

3. Interim order granted earlier shall continue to operate, until further orders.

 

[2017] 246 TAXMAN 373 (SC)

 
Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.