Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

When the assessee has been allotted certain shares as consideration for property transfer, then the question of value of those shares by invoking Section 56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act, does not arise. When a value is fixed for a share allotted, it reflects the market value of the asset transferred. It is not the case of the Assessing Officer that the assessee has not valued the assets while transferring the same to the company. What is to be considered is that this exchange/barter is on a particular date. When the exchange was on 27/03/2012 and when the shares were allotted on 27/03/2012, the Assessing Officer seeks to value the already allotted shares on 31/03/2012 i.e., after allotment of 40,000 equity shares at a premium of Rs.400/- per share which gave the company premium of Rs.1,56,00,000/-. This is not permissible. Such method of computation is not laid down under any provision of the Act. Thus, the same is not in accordance with law.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 47 & 56(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 – Capital gain - The assessee is an individual and is engaged in the business of trading in stock, under the name and style of M/s. Ravi jalan, sole proprietor concern. He filed his return of income declaring total income of Rs.3,82,060/-. The AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act and assessed the total income at Rs.1,39,68,151/- interalia, denying the benefit claimed by the assessee u/s 47 (xiv) of the Act, in respect of transfer of assets and liabilities of the proprietary concern M/s. Ravi jalan to a Private Limited Company, M/s. J.S. Tradex Pvt. Ltd. Consequent to the denial of the benefit u/s 47(xiv), the AO alternatively computing the income in question under the head "Income from other sources", by invoking the provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act. A sum of Rs.1,24,54,080/- was brought to tax. Disallowance was made u/s 14A of the Act r.w.r. 8D and also made an addition on account of notional rent. CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by the AO but granted part relief only on the issue of notional rent. ITAT deleted both the addition made under the head "Capital Gain" as well as under the head "income from other sources" on the issue of transfer and also deleted the disallowance of Rs.1,38,690/-. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed. - RAVI JALAN V/s ITO - [2020] 181 ITD 284 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.