Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

All these appeals involved the same assessee and identical issues. We may refer to facts from Income Tax Appeal No. 801 of 2016. No question of law arises. The Income Tax Appeals are, therefore, dismissed.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 32 & 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961—Depreciation— Tribunal is correct in holding that the issue of depreciation on Intellectual Property Rights could not be made subject matter of assessment u/S. 153A without appreciating the fact the director of the assessee company had in his statement u/S. 132(4) during the course of the search withdrawn the claim of depreciation on IPRs and hence, the assessee was not liable for penalty in view of provisions of Section 271(1)(c) as mere fact that the claim was withdrawn during the search would not give rise to the penalty. - PR. CIT V/s FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD. - [2018] 8 ITCD Online 76 (BOM)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.