Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The result of the above discussion is that the impugned orders of penalty dt. 26th April, 2018 were issued far beyond the six-month period of limitation in terms of s. 275(1)(a) of the Act and were, therefore, invalid. On the date that the said orders were issued, i.e., 26th April, 2018 they were without jurisdiction.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 271(1)(c) and 275(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Penalty — Appeal effect order having been passed by AO on 22nd May, 2017, the six month period of limitation under section 275(1)(a) will begin to run from that date ,hence, penalty order passed by AO on 26th April 2018, passes beyond six months was barred by limitation under section 275(1)(a). claim that ITO, Judicial-II received the copy of the order dt. 27th Jan, 2017 of the Tribunal only on 31st October, 2017 was not sustainable — GE Energy Parts Inc vs. Deputy Commissioner of income tax [2019] 310 CTR (Delhi) 729

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.