Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The appellant/assessees are Hindu Undivided Families, which owned properties at Chennai. Both the assessees entered into a Development Agreement with a builder, in terms of which, the assessees were entitled to 60% of the total built up area to be constructed by the developer at its cost and in consideration, the developer was entitled to 40% of undivided share in the land and entitled to retain proportionate 40% of the built up area. The land owners received a non-refundable security deposit of Rs. 10,00,000/- each, during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1996-97. According to the assessees, from the assessment year 1999-2000, the developer commenced selling the built up area and directed the land owners to execute sale deeds in respect of undivided share of the land to the nominees/purchasers of flats from the builder.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 45, 147 & 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reassessment — There was no effective adjudication as to what would be the effective date of Transfer while deciding the correctness of the Reassessment for the year 1996-97 while making protective assessment for the A.Y. 2001-02, thus, reassessment was valid — C Venkatachalam (HUF) vs. Assistant Commissioner of income tax [2019] 419 ITR 204 (Madras).

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.