Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

In the present case, it is not possible to state that the impugned order passed by the Settlement Commission is in any manner contrary to any provisions of the IT Act. Insofar as the findings of fact recorded by the Settlement Commission to the effect that there has been no wilful attempt to conceal material facts in these cases are concerned, the same cannot be gone into by this court while exercising writ jurisdiction in absence of any challenge to such findings on the ground of perversity. Under the circumstances, there is no warrant for exercise of powers under articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 245C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Settlement of cases — Settlement Commission after considering the material on record had given a finding of fact to the effect that there was full and true disclosure made by the assessees and that there was no willful attempt to conceal material facts and if for the reason that issues which pertained to past periods could not be reconciled due to lack of further evidence, the assessees with a view to bring about a settlement, agreed to pay higher amount as proposed by the revenue, it certainly could not be termed as revision of the original disclosure made under section 245C inasmuch as, there was no further disclosure but an acceptance of additional liability based on the disclosure already made before the Settelement commission— Principal Commissioner of income tax vs. ITSC [2020] 420 ITR 149 (Gujarat)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.