Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Sec. 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Penalty - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect cannot be ruled out. The explanation for bonafides, at the cost of repetition, needs to be considered in a fair and objective manner and in the light of human probabilities. The assessee’s explanation regarding bonafides of the claim does not suffer from any apparent inconsistencies or factual errors and it is quite in tune with the human probabilities. Since, there is no concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee in not including Rs. 30.79 crores received as arbitration award in its taxable income and thus, the imposition of penalty is not justifiable. Hence, the AO is directed to delete the impugned penalty. - VAN OORD DREDGING AND MARINE CONT RACTORS BV V/s ASSTT. DIT - [2020] 206 TTJ 366 (ITAT-MUMBAI)