Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

This appeal is against imposition of penalty under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 271(1)(c) of Income-tax Act, 1961— Penalty - The addition/disallowance sustained by CIT(A) on account of deduction claimed under s. 10A of the Act is not due to any inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee but on a purely presumptive basis. The assessee cannot be accused of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income so as to be visited with penalty under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. In the course of hearing, it was brought to Tribuna’s notice by the assessee that under identical facts and circumstances, CIT(A) has deleted the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act in the asst. yr. 2005–06. Thus, the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act amounting to Rs. 19,31,604, deleted. - AURO GOLD JEWELLERY (P.) LTD. V/s DY. CIT - [2020] 204 TTJ 1005 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.