Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

This is a case where details of investment in shares and immovable property were not originally disclosed by the petitioner at the time of filing of the original returns under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the respective assessment years.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Unexplained investment - The petitioner had filed returns under section 139 of the Act, for the respective assessment years. These returns were assessed under section 143 of the Act. Later, two separate notices were issued under section 148 of the Act, 1961 on data captured in AIR. The writ petition dismissed holding that ”the impugned notices were not only in time but also in accordance with law“. - KRISHNAMURTHY (T.) V/s ITO - [2020] 272 TAXMAN 080 (MAD)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.