Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The solitary grievance of the Revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty of Rs. 76,42,611/- levied u/s 271AAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Penalty — It was incumbent upon the AO to first establish that there was undisclosed  income within the meaning of section 271AAA before any penalty under the section could be levied.  While levying the penalty, the AO had nowhere mentioned specifically any undisclosed income within the meaning of undisclosed income given under section 271AAA, the AO had levied the penalty mechanically by taking difference in the return of income and assessed income. the penalty order was devoid of any specific finding in respect of any specific seized material or undisclosed income detected as a result of Search — Deputy Commissioner of income tax vs. Himanshu Verma [2019] 76 ITR (trib) 698 (Delhi)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.