Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The appeal (ITA 14 of 2019) along with the connected stay application (GA 3412 of 2018) is dismissed.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 271 & 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961—Penalty—Notice imposing penalty set aside as neither the show-cause notice nor the order of the Commissioner specified which particular clause of Rule 173-Q had been allegedly contravened by the assessee.

Facts: The Revenue has preferred an appeal from the order of the Tribunal setting aside the imposition of penalty under Rule 173-Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the ground that neither the show-cause notice nor the order of the Commissioner specified which particular clause of Rule 173-Q had been allegedly contravened by the assessee.

Held, that finding of the Tribunal is correct. Rule 173-Q contains six clauses, the contents of which are not same. It was, therefore, necessary for the assessee to be put on notice as to the exact nature of contravention for which the assessee was liable under the provisions of Rule 173-Q. This not having been done,the Tribunal's finding cannot be faulted. - PR. CIT V/s BASANTI PROPERTIES (P.) LTD. - [2019] 10 ITCD Online 77 (CAL)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.