Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

In this case, the Petition under Section 391 of Cr.PC had been filed by the Petitioners even at the time of presentation of the appeal. These documents sought to be marked as additional evidence are not new documents and they are documents relating to filing of returns with the Respondent in respect of earlier years and the copies of which are also available with the Respondent. By marking of these documents, the nature or course of the case will not be altered. The documents have not been produced before the Trial Court due to inefficiency or inadvertence of the person who conducted the case. Where the documents were left out to be marked due to carelessness and ignorance, it could be allowed to be marked for elucidation of truth, in the interest of justice, by exercising powers under Section 391 of Cr.PC. The intention of Section 391 of Cr.PC is to empower the Appellate Court to see that the justice is done between the prosecutor and the prosecuted in the interest of justice. This Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners should be allowed to let in additional evidence subject to provisions of Chapter XXIII of Cr.PC in the presence of the Respondent/ complainant and his counsel.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 276C & 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961—Offence and prosecution— As per Section 391 of Cr. PC, the Appellate Court, if it thinks additional evidence is necessary, shall record its reasons and take such evidence itself. Assessee have been charged under Sections 276C(2) read with 278B(3) for having wilfully failed to pay the penalty and having deliberately failed to admit the capital gains arising from the transactions done by the Company and the assessee contended that these documents were available with the assessee and that they were also available with the revenue, however they were left out to be marked due to oversight and mistake of their counsel and these documents are essential for arriving at a conclusion that the assessee did not have mens rea to suppress the income and that they have not suppressed any capital gains earned by them and these documents are also essential to show that at no point of time, earlier or during the period of offence, the assessee have committed the offences, however, they have been left out without being marked, therefore, the court below shall complete recording of additional evidence subject to the provisions of Chapter XXIII of Cr.PC, as expeditiously as possible, in the presence of the Revenue/ complainant and his counsel and the Respondent's counsel may cross examine the assessee/ Appellants on the same day or any other date fixed by the Appellate Court — Gangothri Textiles Ltd. Vs. ASSTT. CIT [2020] 269 TAXMAN 282 (MAD)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.