Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The Authority concludes that the instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as the Respondent has neither been benefited from additional ITC nor has there been a reduction in the tax rate in the post-GST period.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that provisions of Section 171 (1) of the Act, requiring that “any reduction in rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of ITC shall be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices” was not applicable in the present case. The authority observed that there is no contravention of Section 171 (1) and the Authority concurred with the DGAP report and observed that the application filed by the Applicant requesting action against the Respondent for alleged violation of the provisions of the Section 171 is not maintainable.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority dismissed the application.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.