The suspension of the GSTIN of the petitioner is stayed and transactions on the GSTIN of the petitioner shall be permitted to be done.
Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017— Suspension of Registration -- The petitioner challenged the suspension of the GSTIN vide impugned notice dated 8th February, 2021. The counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has erroneously impleaded the Authority under the CGST instead of the State Authority. The petitioner counsel submitted that the Central Authority is a necessary party and in fact, the reliefs sought have to be granted by them only, but he has no objection to the impleadment of the State Authority.The Commissioner, GST, Delhi is impleaded as respondent No.2 to this petition.
Held that:-The Hon’ble High Court issued notice and listed it on 25th March, 2021. Further directed that till then, the suspension of the GSTIN of the petitioner is stayed and transactions on the GSTIN of the petitioner shall be permitted to be done.
The suspension of the GSTIN of the petitioner is stayed and transactions on the GSTIN of the petitioner shall be permitted to be done.
Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017— Suspension of Registration -- The petitioner challenged the suspension of the GSTIN vide impugned notice dated 8th February, 2021. The counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has erroneously impleaded the Authority under the CGST instead of the State Authority. The petitioner counsel submitted that the Central Authority is a necessary party and in fact, the reliefs sought have to be granted by them only, but he has no objection to the impleadment of the State Authority.The Commissioner, GST, Delhi is impleaded as respondent No.2 to this petition.
Held that:-The Hon’ble High Court issued notice and listed it on 25th March, 2021. Further directed that till then, the suspension of the GSTIN of the petitioner is stayed and transactions on the GSTIN of the petitioner shall be permitted to be done.