Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period from 01.07.2017 to the period of investigation and to which this Order is passed, when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively for such period.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the benefit of additional ITC to the tune of 4.80% of the turnover, during the post GST period from 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2019. The Respondent had to pass on the additional ITC of Rs. 16,49,897/- accrued to him during the period from 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2019 by way of commensurate reduction in prices under Section 171 of the Act. Provisions of Section 171 of the Act have been contravened by the Respondent. The authority found that the benefit of additional ITC of 4.80% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent, which was required to be passed on to the recipients.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority directed the amount the profiteering amount along with the interest @ 18% shall be paid/passed on by the Respondent within a period of 3 months. However, since the provisions of Section 171 (3A) have come into force w.e.f 01.01.2020 and hence, was not in force during the period of investigation i.e. from 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2019, when the Respondent had committed the above violation and hence the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.