Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

As per section 75(4) of CGST Act, it is very much evident that an opportunity of hearing shall be given when a request is made in writing by the person who is charged with tax or penalty or where any adverse decision is contemplated. In the instant case, there is violation of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. It may not be necessary to go into the other aspects since the impugned order is liable to be set aside on this ground alone.

Section 75 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Demand Notice –-- The petitioner sought writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned Order passed in Form DRC-07 dated 14.12.2020, relating to the Tax Periods 04/2018 to 03/2019 under the IGST Act, 2017, as violative of the principles of natural justice unjustified and unsustainable and illegal and consequently set aside the same. The petitioner challenged order mainly on the ground that no opportunity of personal hearing was given to him as contemplated under Section 75(4) of the Act. The court observed that a notice for personal hearing dated 13.10.2020, was issued to the petitioner. But on that day, the respondent directed the petitioner to produce documents for verification but did not give any date for hearing. Therefore, there is violation of Section 75(4) of the Act.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the order dated 14.12.2020, relating to the tax periods from 04/2018 to 03/2019 under the IGST Act, 2017, and remanded the matter back to respondent for consideration of the same after giving notice of personal hearing to the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.