Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

In the instant case, admittedly no notice was given to the petitioner before contemplating to pass an adverse order. Such a course of caution is prejudicial to the interest of assessee and the same would be in violation of Sub-Section (4) of Section 75 of CGST Act, 2017.

Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 – Personal Hearing –– The petitioner challenged the order of Assessment dated 09.07.2020 and the Rectification Order dated 25.07.2020, imposing Tax, Penalty and Interest as violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioner submitted that an opportunity of hearing should have been granted to the petitioner in terms of Sub-Section (4) of Section 75 of the Act. The court observed that an opportunity of hearing is required to be given where a request was made in writing to the person chargeable with taxes and penalty or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. Failure to do so, amounts to violation of principles of natural justice.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the Assessment Order dated 09.07.2020 and the Rectification Order dated 25.07.2020 and remanded the matter to respondent for consideration of the issues and for passing appropriate orders in accordance with law afresh after giving notice of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.