Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the order passed under Section 61 and Section 74 of the GST Act, 2017. Both the assessing authority as well as the appellate authority have committed the said misreading of GSTR-9, hence both the impugned orders cannot stand and are set aside. The respondents are directed to adjust the amount of GST deposited by the petitioner.

Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017—Show Cause Notice —-The petitioner challenged the order dated 4.6.2021 passed under Section 61 and Section 74 of the Act and the order dated 26.10.2021 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner is dismissed. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that very basis of the notice is wrong inasmuch as in his GSTR-9, the turnover of an amount 129.52 lakhs is shown as only with regard to supply made to unregistered persons i.e. under B2C category. The court observed that the authority concerned has failed to take into consideration the entire form which at its end shows a total turnover through GSTR-9 in the financial year 2017-18. The counsel for the respondent could not dispute same. Both the assessing authority as well as the appellate authority have committed the said misreading of GSTR-9.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the orders and directed to the respondents to adjust the amount of GST deposited by the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.