Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

In the present case, this Court has no hesitation to hold that, the first respondent has not followed the mandatory guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment in Radhakrishnan Case while passing order under Section 83making a provisional attachment of the Bank Account of the petitioners. The order of provisional attachment made by the first respondent shall not stand in the legal scrutiny. Accordingly, it is set aside.

Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017  – Provisional Attachment of Bank Accounts –- The petitioner challenged the proceedings under section 83 of the Act, whereby their bank accounts were attached during the pendency of search under section 67 of the Act. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that before invoking Section 83, the first respondent has no material or reason to form an opinion that unless the Bank accounts of the petitioners are attached, the interest of the Revenue cannot be protected. He placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of M/s.Radha Krishnan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. The said mandatory guidelines has not been followed in the present case. The court observed that the order of provisional attachment made by the first respondent dated 20.12.2021, shall not stand in the legal scrutiny. Therefore, it is liable to be interfered with.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned order. As a sequel, the consequential order, informing the petitioner by the respondent Bank authorities dated 30.12.2021 is also set aside.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.