Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Since no order was served upon the petitioner as required under Section 78 of the act of 2017, as an interim measure, it is directed that effect and operation of order shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.

Section 79 of the CGST Act — Recovery – The petitioner challenged order under Form GST DRC-13 on the ground that the same has been issued without following the procedure prescribed under the Act. The respondents have not issued notice as provided under Section 73 (1) of the Act of 2017 nor the order of adjudication determining the GST liability. But proceedings have been initiated vide order under Section 79 of the Act of 2017 within less than three months period. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that at no point of time, the recovery order was ever served upon the petitioner. The court observed that no order was served upon the petitioner as required under Section 78 of the Act. Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court directed that effect and operation of order /notice dated 01.10.2021 shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing subject to petitioner depositing 50% of the total payable tax amount within a period of three weeks. Listed the case alongwith similar matters.
Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.