Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Since learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the reliefs for declaring the provisions of Section 16(2)(aa), 16(2)(c) of the Act of 2017 and Rule 36(4) of the Rules of 2017 as unconstitutional, the order dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure-3) passed by the respondent No.2 is quashed and set aside.

Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017— Input Tax Credit —– The petitioner challenged the validity of Section 16(2)(aa), Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4) with a further prayer to quash and set aside the order dated 27.12.2021. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent No.2 vide order dated 27.12.2021 has passed an order for return of ITC claimed by the petitioner. The counsel for the respondent No.2 admitted that the impugned order dated 27.12.2021 is passed ignoring the fact that the GST on the supplied items has already been paid by the suppliers.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court quashed the order dated 27.12.2021 and directed the respondent No.2 to pass a fresh order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.