Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The writ-applicant is here before this Court as he has been served with a show-cause notice in Form GST MOV-10 dated 11.04.2022 calling upon him to show cause as to why the goods should not be confiscated under Section-130 of the GST Act. Notice issued to respondent.

Section 129/130 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Goods in Transit –— The applicant’s goods and conveyance were intercepted on 08.04.2022 and served with a SCN in Form GST MOV-10 dated 11.04.2022 for confiscation of goods under Section-130 of the Act. The cousel for applicant submitted that in accordance with Subsection (3) of Section-129, the Proper Officer is obliged to issue a notice within seven days of detention or seizure specifying the penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order within a period of seven days from the date of service of said notice for payment of penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) of Sub-section (1). He placed reliance on decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of M.S. Meghdoot Logistics Vs. Commercial Tax Officer decided on 21.12.2020. The court observed that they are exploring the possibility of ordering provisional release of the goods on the condition that the applicant shall deposit the entire amount towards penalty. There is some confusion as regards the exact amount due and payable towards penalty.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 20.04.2022.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.