Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The Court is of the view that the issues and aspects raised in the petition on merits with regard to the challenge to the impugned order and rejecting the refund claim of the petitioner could be better agitated before the appellate tribunal. The present petition is dismissed on the said ground alone without expressing any opinion of the merits.

Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017— Transition Provisions -– The petitioner prayed to set aside the order-in-original dated 30.04.2021 and to set aside the order-in-appeal dated 24.09.2021, further to refund the service tax paid in cash along with the applicable interest under the transitional provision of Act. The advocate for the petitioner submitted various contentions on the aspect of applicability or otherwise of section 142(6)(a) of the Act. The Court observed that the petitioner has alternative statutory remedy under section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1994 read with section 86 in Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 read with section 174 of the Act. The petitioner is required to exhaust the statutory alternative remedy before invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court permitted the petitioner to approach the Tribunal.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.