Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

This court is of the view that it should not entertain this writ application against the final order passed by the Authority concerned in MOV-11 confiscating the goods and the conveyance. The writ applicant should prefer an appropriate appeal under Section 107 of the Act before the Appellate Authority.

Section 129, 130 of the CGST Act, 2017  — Goods in Transit – The petitioner prayed for quashing impugned orders under Forms MOV-06, MOV-10 and MOV-11 dated 23.09.2021 and 07.10.2021 respectively and to direct the Respondent to release the goods and the conveyance. The counsel for the writ applicant submitted that the impugned order passed by the respondent confiscating the goods as well as the conveyance is a non-speaking order. The court observed that the writ applicant as well as the applicant are to prefer an appropriate appeal under Section 107 of the Act before the Appellate Authority.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court directed that if any Appeals are filed, the Appellate Authority shall look into those and decide them in accordance with the law.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.