Exercising power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., in the instant case, does not arise for setting aside the order passed by the lower court.
Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017— Bail - The petitioner department challenged the relief order dated 07.08.2019 of the Court. The respondent petition for anticipatory bail was allowed by imposing certain conditions. The court observed that there is no violation of any condition or even disobedience of the order. Unless there is any violation of conditions, it cannot arise for exercising power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for intervention in the impugned order.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court held that no intervention for setting aside the impugned order is required.
Exercising power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., in the instant case, does not arise for setting aside the order passed by the lower court.
Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017— Bail - The petitioner department challenged the relief order dated 07.08.2019 of the Court. The respondent petition for anticipatory bail was allowed by imposing certain conditions. The court observed that there is no violation of any condition or even disobedience of the order. Unless there is any violation of conditions, it cannot arise for exercising power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for intervention in the impugned order.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court held that no intervention for setting aside the impugned order is required.