Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

This Authority, under the powers conferred on it vide Rule 133(4) of the CGST Rules read with Section 171 of the CGST Act 2017, directs the DGAP to reinvestigate this case and recompute the quantum of profiteering.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the benefit of the additional ITC of 0.17% of the taxable turnover has accrued to the Respondent and the same was required to be passed on. The provision of Section 171 of the Act, 2017 has been contravened by the Respondent in as much as the additional benefit of ITC of the base price received by the Respondent during the period 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2019, has not been passed on. The Authority observed that there are variations in the figures of Turnovers and ITCs. Therefore, there is a need for an investigation into this aspect to ensure that the Respondent has passed on the benefit of ITC. 

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority directed the DGAP to further investigate the present case under Rule 133 (4) of the Rules to ensure the Respondent has passed on the benefit of ITC by way of a commensurate reduction in the prices in respect of the residential units supplied by him.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.