Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The crux of grievance in present petition is non-communication of the order of cancellation of registration within the period of limitation prescribed for preferring an appeal whereby depriving the petitioner of availing the remedy of appeal. The impugned order of rejection of appeal as time barred cannot be interfered with.

Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Cancellation of Registration ––- The petitioner challenged the impugned Appeal order dated 04.03.2022, whereby the Appellate Authority has dismissed the Appeal as time-barred and sought directions to the respondents to revoke the cancelled GST Registration. The petitioner counsel contended that neither the SCN issued on 16.05.2018 nor the order of cancellation was communicated to the petitioner. The respondent’s counsel submitted that SCN and order of cancellation of registration were both uploaded on the portal in terms of Section 169(1) (D) of Act. The court observed that the respondents adhered to the provision of Section 169  as regards communication of the SCN as well as order of cancellation, therefore, no fault can be found with the Revenue.

Held that:-The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the petition.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.