Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Merely because the respondent is a partner in one of the entities and sole proprietor of the other, does not mean that he cannot separately be arrested for a distinct transaction.

Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Bail — The petitioner- DGGI challenged order dated 24.09.2020 made by the learned CMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, whereby the respondent was granted bail on two main basis- one, that the respondent has already been arrested in a matter relating to transactions of M/s Gaia Overseas, of which the respondent was one of the partners; and accordingly could not be re-arrested a second time in relation to the transactions relating to M/s Aadhar India, of which he is sole proprietor. Two, that the respondent has prima facie shown that he has secured an amount of about 40% of the amount of tax allegedly evaded. The respondent submitted that the impugned order is legally flawed as each transaction comprises a separate offence under the GST Act. Held that:-The Hon’ble High Court listed the matter on 17.12.2020.
Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.