Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

As no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2019 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171(1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report after a detailed investigation under Rule 129. The DGAP reported that the benefit of ITC had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1, the provisions of Section 171(1) of the Act, 2017 had been contravened in the present case. The amount of profiteering by the Respondent was Rs. 12,79,304/(inclusive of GST @18% amounting to Rs. 1,95,148/-). The Authority observed that the respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 12,79,304/- during the period of investigation i.e. 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2019. The said amount shall be refunded by him, alongwith interest @18% thereon, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (b) of the Rules.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority directed the jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST to monitor this order under the supervision of the DGAP by ensuring that the amount profiteered by the Respondent as ordered by the Authority is passed on to the Applicant No. 1. A Report in compliance of this order shall be submitted to this Authority within a period of 4 months.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.