Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The Respondent has denied the benefit of additional ITC to his customers/recipients in contravention or the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act. 2017 and resorted to profiteering and hence, committed an offence under section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, the Respondent is liable for the imposition of penalty for the period 01.01.2020 to 30.04.2020 under the provisions of the above Section.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the benefit of additional ITC to the tune of 0.08% of the turnover, has accrued to the Respondent post-GST and the same was required to be passed on by the Respondent to his recipients. Provisions of Section 171 of the Act have been contravened by the Respondent. The authority found that the benefit of additional ITC of 0.08% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent, which was required to be passed on to the recipients.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority directed the amount the profiteering amount along with the interest @ 18% shall be paid/passed on by the Respondent within a period of 3 months. However, since the provisions of Section 171 (3A) have come into force w.e.f 01.01.2020 and were in force during the period of investigation i.e. from 01.07.2017 to 30.04.2020, therefore, the Respondent is liable for imposition of penalty under the provisions of the above Section for the amount profiteered from 01.01.2020 onwards. Accordingly, notice be issued to him.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.