Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Considering the gravity of the alleged offence, severity of the punishment provided for the alleged offence and the aforesaid reasons, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant-accused Saurabh srivastava is not entitled to bail at this stage.

Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 —Bail –--The applicant prayed for regular bail. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated as he has not availed any ITC. The applicant was pressurised by the officials concerned and his signatures were obtained on several blank papers and on some already typed documents. An amount of Rs. 1,25,80,980/- has been paid by one firm and after deducting the said amount from the claimed amount, the case of the applicant/accused comes under the said limit of Rs. 5 crore and becomes bailable offence. The court observed that allegations levelled against the applicant are that he issued fake invoices to the tune of Rs. 5.65 crore without the actual supply of goods. Considering the gravity and the nature of the allegations levelled against the applicant/accused and the fact that the investigation of the case is at nascent stage, this Court is not inclined to grant concession of bail to applicant.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the bail application.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.