Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The petitioner is not entitled to pre-arrest bail. Application is disposed of.

Section 438 of CrPC –— Pre Arrest Bail -- The petitioner sought pre-arrest bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that if the contents of the FIR are read, it only discloses that there is monetary dispute between the parties. The court observed that FIR contains no allegations that the petitioner was fraudulently selling goods by impersonating as M/s. Zentic Pharmaceuticals. Therefore, if the allegations regarding alleged evasion of GST by the petitioner is excluded for the time being from consideration, then from the contents of the FIR, it strongly appears that there is a financial dispute between the informant and the petitioner. However, in the affidavit-in-opposition, the informant has referred to mobile call screenshots, to mount pressure to compromise the matter. This does amount to breach of the conditions on which interim pre-arrest bail was granted to the petitioner by interim order dated 26.10.2022. Under such circumstances, the Court does not find this to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court rejected the application.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.