This Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petitioner has not established any acceptable ground for the purpose of entertaining the Writ Petition and accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.
Show Cause Notice –––– The petitioner a manufacturer and supplier of LPG stoves, wet grinders, juicers, salad makers and mixer grinders. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that similar issues raised in the present petition are already pending and in one such Petition, the Madras High Court has set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the authority for fresh consideration. The court observed that the impugned SCN provides all the details regarding allegations. The petitioner is asked to submit their representations/defence or documents to defend their case by availing the opportunity. Therefore, the petitioner is expected to defend their case before the competent authority by submitting their explanations/defence statements and thereafter, the authorities are bound to pass speaking order by furnishing reasons for such a decision. The writ petitioner has not established any acceptable ground for the purpose of entertaining the Petition.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the writ Petition.
This Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petitioner has not established any acceptable ground for the purpose of entertaining the Writ Petition and accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.
Show Cause Notice –––– The petitioner a manufacturer and supplier of LPG stoves, wet grinders, juicers, salad makers and mixer grinders. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that similar issues raised in the present petition are already pending and in one such Petition, the Madras High Court has set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the authority for fresh consideration. The court observed that the impugned SCN provides all the details regarding allegations. The petitioner is asked to submit their representations/defence or documents to defend their case by availing the opportunity. Therefore, the petitioner is expected to defend their case before the competent authority by submitting their explanations/defence statements and thereafter, the authorities are bound to pass speaking order by furnishing reasons for such a decision. The writ petitioner has not established any acceptable ground for the purpose of entertaining the Petition.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the writ Petition.