Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Once the Respondent has claimed that he had passed on the benefit of ITC to his customers/flat buyers/recipients, and claimed the benefit of such amount, the onus to prove that the benefit of ITC was actually passed on to the eligible buyers was on the Respondent.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the benefit of additional ITC of 3.86% of the total amount demanded by the Respondent from the home buyers who made bookings on or before 30.09.2019, has accrued to the Respondent and the same was required to be passed on to them. The Respondent was required to pass on the benefit of ITC to the tune of Rs. 7,90,97,474/-. However, he had actually passed on an amount of Rs. 8,28,91,520/-. Therefore, the allegation that the Respondent has contravened the provision of Section 171  did not appear to be sustainable, and no additional profiteered amount was required to be returned. The authority observed that the Respondent’s claim of having passed on the benefit to his recipients/homebuyers requires to be verified against third party evidence in the form of written acknowledgements receipts from the homebuyers.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority sent back the matter to the DGAP for further investigation as per the provisions Section 171(2) read with Rule 133(4) and directed the DGAP to verify the evidence submitted by the Respondent to evidence the passage of ITC benefit from the Respondent to the homebuyers and submit his Report.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.