Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The appellant-petitioner bypassing statutory remedy by way of filing an appeal, approached this Court, challenging the penalty proceedings on the ground that the proceedings concluded before the authority was without complying with the principles of natural justice. It is also pointed out that there was a glaring mistake committed by the authority while concluding the proceedings. In the absence of any serious lapse in concluding the proceedings, this Court under Article 226 will not be justified in interfering with such matters.

Section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Demand Order-- The petitioner filed appeal challenging an order, whereby, the penalty has been imposed on them, on the ground that the proceedings concluded before the authority was without complying with the principles of natural justice. The learned Single Judge viewed that it is not a case that requires the interference of the Court, inasmuch as that the order is appealable. The court observed that they could not find that there was a denial of any natural justice to the appellant while concluding the proceedings before the authority. In the absence of any serious lapse in concluding the proceedings, this Court under Article 226 will not be justified in interfering with such matters.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the Appeal.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.