Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The amount paid by the petitioner shall be treated as amount paid by the petitioner “under protest” and will be subject to the final appropriation in the proceedings to be initiated under Sections 73 / 74 of CGST Act, 2017. This court is inclined to dispose the Writ Petition by directing the respondent or the proper officers concerned to complete the investigation and proceed to issue appropriate show cause notice to the petitioner.

Section 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 –– Amount deposited under coercion um  –The petitioner sought a Mandamus to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 17,27,790/- and Rs. 12,60,472/- which was paid by the petitioner during the course when the officers of the respondent visited his premises and investigated regarding the alleged wrong availment of ITC. The petitioner submitted that the aforesaid amount was paid under coercion. The court observed that the amount paid by the petitioner are only deposits pending proper adjudication under Section 73 / 74 of the Act. There is no merits in this Writ Petition at this stage. The amount paid by the petitioner shall be treated as amount paid by the petitioner “under protest”.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court directed the respondent to complete the investigation and proceed to issue appropriate SCN within a period of six months. Further directed the respondent to return the photo copies of the seized documents to the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.